Why I Still Like The 8-Bit Chips

I was sad to see ROS2 seemed to be leaving rosserial behind, which also abandons the simple 8-bit microcontrollers they supported. They may not measure up on the megahertz or the megabyte numbers, but they still had their advantages for quick and simple prototyping.

My favorite part is the fact they tend to require minimal support components, or occasionally none at all. This feature allows me to do simple “deadbug” projects where I solder components directly to the pins of the chip skipping the circuit board. This advantage is directly linked to their disadvantages: modern processors usually require an external clock signal source because it’s hard to build an accurate fast clock on board the chip, in contrast the older and slower chips can make do with on board oscillators because they’re not as dependent on an accurate clock. Similarly, many modern chips require external voltage regulation support because they need to run within a narrow voltage range and the older chips are much more relaxed about it. The PIC16F18345 I occasionally play with can be hooked up directly to a couple of AA batteries (or a single lithium ion cell) and as the battery voltage drops, the chip doesn’t seem to care.

The older simpler chips also tend to be more robust. In addition to tolerating a wider range of voltage input, they also tolerate a large range of current output. Some of the modern controllers’ output pins can’t even sustain 20 milliamps, the standard amount to illuminate a LED. It felt very weird for me to wire up a transistor just to do a LED. In contrast, the PIC16F18345 is specified to support 50 milliamps.

And really, they’re just good simple tools for good simple projects. I was happy to dust off an old PIC program for the hacked-up VFD driver project. When I only needed to flip some pins around, I really don’t need a Swiss army knife of fancy peripherals.

One thought on “Why I Still Like The 8-Bit Chips

  1. I’m another fan of old-school 8-bit micros. The 6502, Z80, 1802 etc. are my favorites. They’re the “bicycles” of computers — small and simple enough to be completely comprehensible, yet powerful enough to do real things.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s